![]() ![]() It’s because of older information they’re misinformed about, a range of issues that aren’t considered and a ratings system that needs to be drastically overhauled because of the stigma that video-games still carry with them. The reason they look at scenes such as that harsher isn’t because of what you claim, that’s not fact. It’s *far* too simplistic the way you’re putting it, trying to look at it black and white like that. The idea now that someone with a mental illness? That someone who was abused? That combining a hundred different factors external to that and then ladelling this on top? That this may be a *contributing factor*? Possibly, but then which do you blame? The person who beat them? The mental illness? The game? The way the healthcare system may not have helped them (as has been the case with mentally ill patients for a long time). The idea that simply watching something like that and becoming desenstised will eventually put those ideas iin someones head? Horseshit. They take a harsher view of these scenes because at the current time the ratings board is run by older people who utilise older research, research that has been debunked consistently over the last decade.Įvery single instance almost of violence where people have blamed videogames have found either mental illness or troubled upbringings as the cause of such issues, not merely sitting there watching something such as this. I know what you’re trying to say but again, time and time again it’s been proven *wrong*. I’m sorry but *that* is a silly argument *and* a silly claim. You cannot possibly guarantee that, you’ve got no basis for it, no evidence for it and no possible reasoning for it. In the Board’s opinion, the above example constitutes a depiction of implied sexual violence and therefore cannot be accommodated within the R18+ classification category and the game is therefore Refused Classification. The Board is of the opinion that this, combined with Blake’s objections and distress, constitutes a depiction of implied sexual violence. As Blake protests, saying “No! Stop that!” the creature thrusts again, before placing its face over his midsection and then sitting up and wiping its mouth.Īlthough much of the contact between the creature and Blake is obscurred, by it taking place below screen, the sexualised surroundings and aggressive behaviour of the creature suggest that it is an assault which is sexual in nature. Two other pairs of creatures in the clearing are also implicitly having sex.Īs Blake yells for the creatures to “Get away from her!” a female creature, her greyish breasts bared, pushes him onto his back, holds his arms to the ground and repeatedly thrusts her crotch against him. ![]() One creature has another bent over a rock, thrusting as they implicitly have rear-entry sex, another sits astride the pelvic region of a creature prone on the ground, moving their hips rhythmically as they too implicitly have sex. Humanoid creatures, their skin grey, spattered with blood and scarred, implicity have sex as others pray, or chant, or gesticulate. His wife, Lynn, calls out for his help, saying, “It hurts! Oh god!,” as she hangs from chains on a raised platform at the front of the clearing. His vision blurring, he witnesses what appears to a ritualistic orgy. Your seed will burn this world.” Shortly afterwards, he objects to having psycho-active dust blown into his face, yelling, “Nope! Nope!” before he stumbles into a forest clearing. In one cut-scene in the game … a female creature prepares Blake for a ritual. ( WARNING: the following passage contains a description of implied sexual assault.) One particular scene shows a female creature thrusting against the main character while his wife is tied up in chains:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |